CHOOSEN ARTICAL

Qualitative Review
Scroll down the page to view the Grading Rubric.
Qualitative Review, You will be reviewing the following article:
O’Brien, M.R., Kinloch, K., Groves, K.E., & Jack, B.A. (2018). Meeting patients’ spiritual needs during end of life care: A qualitative study
    of nurses’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of spiritual care training. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28, 182-189.
    doi:10.1111/jocn14648.
Review the article completely, but specifically tease out specific information about the integrity, trustworthiness, confirmability, and authenticity of the study.
The following podcast provides some excellent information about reviewing a qualitative paper: http://academicmedicineblog.org/peer-reviewer-resources-10-tips-for-reviewing-a-qualitative-paper/ (Links to an external site.)
Moulton, C. & Patel, P. (2014). 10 tips for reviewing a qualitative paper. Peer Review Posts in Academic Medicine Rounds-beyond the pages of Academic Medicine. AAMC.
RubricNU 615 Qualitative Article CritiqueNU 615 Qualitative Article CritiqueCriteria    Ratings    PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Relevance35.0 ptsExcellentPaper demonstrates an in-depth discussion of the article and it’s components. Viewpoints are insightful and well supported.25.0 ptsGoodPaper demonstrates a general discussion of the article. Viewpoints are supported.20.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementPaper demonstrates a minimal discussion of assigned article. Viewpoints are unsupported or minimally supported.0.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryPaper demonstrates a lack of discussion or grasp of the components of an article critique. Viewpoints are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported.35.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical thought/ Reasoning/ Synthesis40.0 ptsExcellentThe article critique demonstrates strong evidence of critical thinking, reasoning, and synthesis of ideas and insights gained from reading(s).35.0 ptsGoodThe article demonstrates evidence of critical thinking, reasoning, and synthesis of ideas and insights gained from reading(s).25.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe critique demonstrates little evidence of critical thinking, reasoning, and synthesis of ideas and insights gained from reading(s).0.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThe critique demonstrates no evidence of critical thinking, reasoning, and synthesis of ideas and insights gained from reading(s).40.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Information35.0 ptsExcellentResponse includes all components and exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each step of the critical analysis is included and meets the guidelines set forth for article critique.25.0 ptsGoodResponse includes all components and meets all requirements indicated in the instructions and guidelines for critique. .20.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse is missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions and guidelines for critique. Some aspects of the article critique are not addressed.0.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryResponse excludes essential components and/or does not address the requirements indicated in the instructions and guidelines.35.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Structure/APA Format15.0 ptsExcellentWriting is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than three spelling, grammar, syntax, or APA errors. Headings are used appropriately.10.0 ptsGoodWriting is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than five spelling, grammar, syntax, or APA errors. Headings are used appropriately.6.0 ptsNeeds ImprovementWriting is unclear and/or disorganized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. There are more than five spelling, grammar, syntax, or APA errors. Headings are not used appropriately.0.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryWriting is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little sense. There are numerous spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response. Headings are missing and/or not used appropriately.15.0 ptsTotal Points: 125.0

CLICK HERE TO ORDER NOW!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *